By an interim order dated April 16, 2026 (“Interim Order”), the High Court for the State of Telangana (“Telangana HC”) granted an interim stay in an interlocutory application filed by Mudrakartha Veenadhari (“Appellant” or “Allottee”). The Court stayed the operation and effect of an impugned order dated February 11, 2026. This impugned order had been passed by the Appellate Tribunal in T.A. No. 42 of 2025. The application (I.A. No. 2 of 2026) was filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C), pending the disposal of the main appeal, SA RERA No. 36 of 2026.
The Appellant, acting as the Original Complainant, brought the petition against M/s. R.R. Konstructions (“Respondent”), the Original Promoter.
Upon reviewing the petition, the Court, presided over by the Honourable Sri Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, accepted the contentions at the interim stage and the Court ordered an interim stay on the operation and effect of the Appellate Tribunal’s impugned order dated 11.02.2026.
This matter involves a substantial question of law if Section 3(2) of the RERA Act is to be read conjunctively or disjunctively and the Telangana High Court is to decide on this, which, if decided, will help a lot of Allottees in seeking reliefs from the Promoters/Developers.
The matter was led by Harshavardhan Abburi, Partner, supported by the Constitutional & Administrative Law Litigation Team, including Poojitha Babbepalli, Principal Associate; Manoj Bhukya, Associate; Pooja Gandhi, Associate; and Phanindranath Chowdary Ponneganti, Associate.
Harsha has worked extensively in Litigation and Corporate Commercial matters. He has appeared and advised on various Forums including High Court, NCLT, Civil Courts, Consumer Commissions, etc.