Home >Articles & Publications>Article>Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal Findings On Delay Analysis Using The Critical Path Method And Reiterates Limits Of Section 34 Review

Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal Findings On Delay Analysis Using The Critical Path Method And Reiterates Limits Of Section 34 Review

Urban expressway and high-rise buildings under construction at sunset, with cranes and scaffolding silhouetted against a golden sky.

The Delhi High Court (“Delhi HC”), in Ircon International Limited vs. Afcons Infrastructure Limited1, has provided important guidance on the evaluation of critical path analysis and delay attribution in construction disputes. The Delhi HC examined whether an arbitral tribunal’s findings on delay, based on project schedules and critical path analysis, could be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”).

Please click here to read the full article by Dheeraj Nair, Partner, Anjali Anchayil, Partner, and was published in Mondaq.

POST TAGS

Tags Arbitration India, Commercial Arbitration, Construction Disputes, Critical Path Method, Delhi High Court, Dispute Resolution India, Infrastructure Law India, JSA, Leading Law Firm, Leading Lawyers, Legal Update India, Project Delay Claims, Section 34 India

Anjali Anchayil Partner

Anjali specialises in commercial arbitrations, litigation and complex corporate insolvencies. She handles a wide variety of matters before the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and arbitral tribunals.

Dheeraj Nair Partner

Dheeraj is a Partner with JSA since 2009. Dheeraj has over two decades of experience advising and representing clients on complex arbitrations, litigations and regulatory proceedings.