The Supreme Court’s ruling clarifies that attorney-client privilege under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 applies only to independent advocates, not in-house counsel. As salaried employees lacking professional independence, in-house lawyers’ communications with employers are not privileged, exposing internal legal advice to disclosure. Companies must therefore route sensitive matters through external counsel to ensure statutory confidentiality.
Revisiting Privilege: Implications of the Supreme Court’s Ruling on In‑House Counsel Communication
- Article
- Padmaja Kaul
- March 10, 2026
POST TAGS
Articles & Publications
- Publication
- June 23, 2026
Venkatesh R. Prasad | The industry and the government need to work in tandem and not at cross-purposes
- Publication
- June 23, 2026
Ashish Suman | Policy intent is visible; enforceability needs strengthening
- Article
- June 23, 2026
Mergers & Acquisitions: Impact of the revised ECB regulations on M&A transactions
- Article
- June 23, 2026
RBI’s ECL Framework: From Incurred Loss Regime to Expected Loss Regime
- Publication
- June 22, 2026







Padmaja is a proficient legal practitioner with extensive and diverse experience of over 13 years in corporate commercial laws and dispute resolution, specializing in commercial litigation, arbitration, white collar crime, employment disputes, insolvency and pre-dispute advisory.