If you are not happy with the results, please do another search

Setting the stage for Labour Codes implementation

The Government is serious about enforcement of the Labour Codes. It has meticulously planned to kickstart their implementation process soon. This is reflected in its overall strategy to take up Labour Codes implementation plan with rigour in the forthcoming budget to be announced on 1st February 2025. To make this happen, it has bolstered its efforts in getting Delhi and West Bengal to issue their draft rules by 31st March 2025.

The Wages Code and the Social Security Code will be the first two Labour Codes in the series of four Codes to be enforced. This will ensure that the Labour Codes in general and the Wages and the Social Security Codes in particular gain nationwide acceptance.

These two Codes are intended to be enforced in three phases. Large firms (500 employees and above) may take the lead on mandatory statutory compliances in the first year of the rollout followed by mid-size firms (100-500 employees) in the second year and small organisations (100 employees or less) in the third year. Enforcing two Labour Codes instead of all the four Labour Codes together will lessen the overall compliance burden that primarily rests on the employers. Selecting the Wages and the Social Security Codes to be the first two Codes to be implemented will be a game changer. These two Codes largely benefit the workforce including contingent, gig and platform workers. Hence, both the trade unions and employees are likely to extend cooperation and support their employers in implementation of the Labour Codes. This will test the waters and pave the way for modernizing the Indian labour law regime to suit the modern workplace.

Making compliance of these two Labour Codes mandatory in the first phase for the large corporates will not only lessen the regulatory burden of MSMEs and mid to small-sized organisations but lay the essential groundwork for the remaining organisations to follow suit. Additionally, the large corporates will not only be well-equipped to initiate the implementation process but will help in identifying and removing the potential roadblocks sooner.

The understaffing issue, that currently plagues the efficiency of some of the labour departments, will not adversely impact the enforcement process because the authorities will only need to focus on specific category of employers. These employers will essentially be the GCCs, multinational companies and Indian conglomerates who prioritize corporate governance. Further, proposed shift in the enforcement authority’s role from Labour Inspector to Inspector-cum-Facilitator would fast-track implementation of the new provisions, as they would need to provide compliance guidance to defaulting employers and an opportunity to comply instead of prosecuting them in the first instance.

Such labour law reforms will signal a business-friendly ecosystem in India and aid in achieving a win-win for corporates and their workforce. This will in turn act as a catalyst to boost investor confidence and not only attract new foreign players to India but also encourage existing players to expand their Indian operations. Hence, balancing interests of employers and workers is need of the hour and would go a long way in enhancing workforce participation as India moves towards its goal of becoming a USD 5 trillion economy.

***

By: Minu Dwivedi – Partner, Prashaant Malaviya and Purbasha Panda – Associates

Mint BFSI Summit 2025 IPO Surge: Guardrails for Investors

The 2025 BFSI Summit brought together industry leaders, legal experts, financial experts, and regulatory specialists to dissect the unprecedented surge in public offerings. While multiple perspectives were shared within the panel discussing “IPO Surge: Guarvdrails for Investors”, this blog highlights the detailed insights of JSA Partner and Finance Co-Chair, Madhurima Mukherjee who offered a legal and regulatory lens to the conversation.

The key takeaways include her answers to the moderator’s questions, as follows:

The IPO Boom- What Does it Mean for Investors?

India’s IPO landscape has seen record-breaking activity over the past year, signalling robust economic growth and increased market participation. With more companies choosing to go public, the market is becoming denser and more competitive. However, this surge raises a critical question: are adequate guardrails in place to protect investors in this bullish market?

Madhurima emphasized that while the IPO boom is a positive indicator of economic health, it also demands more robust protections. As the market expands, investors need clarity, transparency, and safeguards to navigate this rapidly evolving space.

How is the Industry Balancing Capital Readiness with Regulatory Vigilance?

The need for capital has accelerated reforms within regulatory bodies like SEBI, NSE, and BSE. By integrating AI and streamlining processes, they’ve enhanced ease of doing business, contributing to the IPO surge.

However, while the clearance process for IPOs has become more efficient, Madhurima noted that the journey to prepare a company for an IPO is now more challenging. Increased regulatory vigilance has made the preparatory phase longer and more complex. This heightened scrutiny ensures that only well-prepared companies enter the market, ultimately protecting investors and fostering greater transparency.

Is SEBI Being Overprotective?

One of the questions brought up the topic of whether SEBI’s regulatory framework is overly cautious and seen as overprotective. It was argued that, given the market’s rapid growth and complexity, SEBI’s vigilance is necessary.

From preventing scandals to mitigating volatility, tighter regulations serve as
essential guardrails for a fast-evolving market. While some might see this as overprotection, Madhurima stressed that these measures are vital for maintaining investor confidence and market stability in the long term.

The IPO Process – Faster or Just More Transparent?

While SEBI has expedited its clearance timelines to reduce backlogs, the overall IPO preparation process has not become faster.

Madhurima explained that companies must meet stringent disclosure norms, tick off complex regulatory checklists, and ensure robust compliance before their IPO documents are approved. While this extended timeline may seem like a roadblock, it’s a necessary trade-off for greater transparency, reduced risks, and enhanced investor protection.

Stay tuned for the full summit recording and catch all the insights from the panel.

All information included in this publication has been compiled from sources we believe are credible and reliable and is provided on an ‘as is’ basis, without any independent verification or warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy or completeness of any such information. JSA shall not be liable for any losses incurred by any person from any use of this publication or its contents. This publication does not constitute legal or any other form of advice from JSA. Should you have any queries in relation to the alert or on other areas of law, please feel free to contact us using the following link https://www.jsalaw.com/contact-us/

To read further details, click here or refer to the below document.

 

*In case the document is not visible on the device you are using, please click the link above.