New Filters: Banking and Finance (including Securities)

If you are not happy with the results, please do another search

JSA Advised Book Running Lead Managers in relation to the proposed Initial Public Offering of Prozeal Green Energy Limited

Initial Public Offering of Prozeal Green Energy Limited.

JSA is advising Nuvama Wealth Management Limited and SBI Capital Markets Limited, the book running lead managers in relation to the proposed initial public offering of equity shares of Prozeal Green Energy Limited (the “Issuer”), the Issuer is planning a fresh issue of up to ₹ 3500.00 million and an offer for sale of up to ₹ 3500.00 million.

Our Transaction Team comprises of Lead Partner, Madhurima Mukherjee Saha, Partner, Sagar Batra, Senior Associate, Richa Prasad and Associates, Anshuman Singh, Priyanshi Bajaj and Rachit Munjal.

Deal Value – INR 7 billion.

Tags Capital Markets, Corporate Finance, Equity Markets, Financial Markets, Fundraising, Green Energy, Investment Banking, IPO, JSA Deal Alert, Legal Advisory, Offer For Sale, Prozeal Green Energy, Renewable Energy, SEBI, Sustainable Investing

Initial Public Offering of Studds Accessories Limited

JSA is advising IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly known as IIFL Securities Limited) and ICICI Securities Limited, the book running lead managers, in relation to the proposed initial public offering of equity shares of Studds Accessories Limited (the “Issuer”), by way of an offer for sale of up to 7,786,120 equity shares by Promoters and certain other shareholders. Studds Accessories Limited designs, manufactures, markets and sells two-wheeler helmets and other accessories under the ‘Studds’ and ‘SMK’ brands. It is the world’s largest two-wheeler helmet player by volume (2024). The draft red herring prospectus was filed with the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Stock Exchanges on March 27, 2025.

Our transaction team comprised Lead Partner, Madhurima Mukherjee Saha, Partner, Anuj Pethia, Senior Associate, Ambuj Gupta and Associates, Harshita Agarwal, Shashwat Sharma and Shivani Agrawal.

Media Coverage – Live mint

Tags Capital Markets, Corporate Finance, Equity Markets, Financial Markets, Fundraising, Helmet Industry, Investment Banking, IPO, JSA Deal Alert, Legal Advisory, Offer For Sale, SEBI, Stock Markets, Studds, Two Wheeler

Proposed offering of units by Anantam Highways Trust

JSA is advising Nuvama Wealth Management Limited in relation to the proposed initial public offering of units of Anantam Highways Trust (“Trust”), an infrastructure investment trust, comprising an issuance of units aggregating up to ₹ 4,000.00 million (“Issue”). As part of the transaction, the InvIT will also acquire nine road assets, operating on a hybrid annuity model, from Dilip Buildcon Limited and its associates, and from certain associates of Alpha Alternatives Holding Private Limited.

The Trust has filed its draft offer document with SEBI on March 29, 2025.

Our Transaction Team Comprised Lead Partner, Arka Mookerjee, Partners, Siddhartha Desai and Pracheta Bhattacharya, Principal Associate, Sourav Modi and Associates, Ankesh Kumar, Jeebitesh Bhattacharya and Vaishnavi Kokkonda.

Deal Value – INR 4 billion.

Tags Capital Markets, Corporate Finance, Financial Markets, Fundraising, Hybrid Annuity Model, Infrastructure Investment, Investment Banking, InvIT, IPO, JSA Deal Alert, Legal Advisory, Road Infrastructure, SEBI, Transport Infrastructure

Institutional Placement of Units by National Highways Infra Trust

JSA advised SBI Capital Markets Limited, Axis Capital Limited, HDFC Bank Limited, and ICICI Securities Limited in relation to the institutional placement of units of National Highways Infra Trust (an InvIT sponsored by NHAI) aggregating to ₹ 50,534.81 million. The transaction also included a preferential issuance of units to NHAI and Employees Provident Fund Organisation.

As part of the transaction, National Highways Infra Trust has also acquired the concession rights over certain road assets of aggregate length of approximately 818.83 kms at an enterprise value of over Rs. 18,000 crores, making it the largest monetization by NHAI and one of the largest transactions in the history of Indian road sector. This was the fourth round of fund raising by National Highways Infra Trust with JSA being a part of all four deals.

Our Transaction Team Comprised Lead Partner, Arka Mookerjee, Partner, Pracheta Bhattacharya, Senior Associate, Sourav Modi and Associates, Ankesh Kumar and Jeebitesh Bhattacharya.

Deal Value – INR 50,534 Million.

Tags Capital Markets, Corporate Finance, Financial Markets, Fundraising, Infrastructure Investment, Institutional placement, Investment Banking, InvIT, JSA Deal Alert, Legal Advisory, Monetization, NHAI, Road Sector, SEBI, Transport Infrastructure

Qualified institutions placement of Restaurant Brands Asia Limited

JSA advised Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Limited in relation to the qualified institutions placement (“QIP”) of equity shares of Restaurant Brands Asia Limited (formerly known as Burger King India Limited) (“Issuer”). The QIP was for issuance of 83,333,333 equity shares of the Issuer, aggregating to approximately ₹ 5,000 million.

The Issuer is a prominent player in the quick service restaurant industry in India. As the national master franchisee of the BURGER KING® brand in India, they have exclusive rights to develop, establish, operate and franchise Burger King branded restaurants in India.

The deal was led by Partners Madhurima Mukherjee Saha and Shivali Singh with support from Associates, Kumar Shubham, Aryaman Singh and Devina Chopra.

Media Coverage – NDTV Profit

Tags Capital Markets, Corporate Finance, Equity Issuance, Financial Markets, Fundraising, Investment Banking, JSA, JSA Deal Alert, Leading Law Firm, Leading Lawyers, Legal Advisory, Legal Updates, QIP, Quick Service Restaurants, Restaurant Industry

Qualified institutions Placement of Centum Electronics Limited

Kedaara Capital Fund II LLP sells its 100% stake in Sunbeam Lightweighting Solutions Private Limited

JSA advised Centum Electronics Limited (the “Issuer”) and DAM Capital Advisors Limited, the book running lead manager, in relation to the qualified institutions placement of equity shares of the Issuer.

Centum Electronics Limited is one of India’s leading end-to-end integrated electronics solutions providers, offering a comprehensive suite of services that spans the entire electronics system design and manufacturing spectrum.

The deal was led by Lead Partner, Madhurima Mukherjee Saha and Partner, Shivali Singh with support from Senior Associate, Ambuj Gupta and Associates, Bhavini Mohan, Rachit Munjal, Priyanshi Bajaj and Anshuman Singh.

Media Coverage – Business Standard

Tags Capital Market, deal, Finance, JSA, Leading Law Firm, Leading Lawyers, Legal Updates, Securities

JSA successfully defended the Dismissal of an appeal challenging the admission order of Tarun Relators Private Limited in applications for recall of the dismissal order filed by its 49% shareholder and ex-suspended director

JSA successfully advised and represented Assets Care & Reconstruction Enterprises Limited (“ACRE”) and other members of the committee of creditors before the Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (“NCLAT”), in dual applications seeking recall of the Hon’ble NCLAT’s order dated October 14, 2024, filed by Mantri Developers Private Limited (“Mantri”), a 49% shareholder of Tarun Realtors Private Limited (“Corporate Debtor”), and Mr. Baaskaran S., the ex-suspended director of the Corporate Debtor.

The said applications were filed for recall of the Hon’ble NCLAT’s order dated October 14, 2024 vide which an appeal filed by Baaskaran S., challenging the admission of the Corporate Debtor to corporate insolvency resolution process (“CIRP”), came to be dismissed owing to the resignation of Baaskaran S. from his post as a director of the Corporate Debtor. It was Mantri’s contention that on the date of dismissal of the appeal, it had filed an application for substitution in place of the ex-suspended director of the Corporate Debtor owing to his resignation, which was not numbered and listed on the date of hearing. Therefore, Mantri contended that owing to the dismissal of the appeal without considering its substitution application, principles of natural justice and due process were violated by the Hon’ble NCLAT.

Mantri further placed reliance on an order dated December 10, 2024 passed by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in a writ petition filed by it challenging the Hon’ble NCLAT’s order dated October 14, 2024, wherein the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court granted liberty to Mantri to file the said recall applications before the Hon’ble NCLAT.

Contending that the said recall applications were not maintainable and without merit, ACRE inter alia adduced the following submissions:-

Mantri had no locus standi to pursue an appeal challenging the admission of the Corporate Debtor to CIRP in its capacity as a shareholder, as it is a mere investor and not an ‘aggrieved person’ under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The exceptional circumstances for recall of an order, as carved out in the judgment of the five-member bench the Hon’ble NCLAT, New Delhi in Union Bank of India Vs Mr. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramaniam & Ors., CA (AT) (Ins) No.729/2020, had not been made out in the present case as there existed no procedural lapses on the date of passing of the order in question.
The recall application filed by Baaskaran S. cannot be maintainable owing to his resignation as a director of the Corporate Debtor, a fact which was not disclosed to the Hon’ble NCLAT on two separate occasions when the Hon’ble NCLAT was considering the said appeal.

By its judgment, the Hon’ble NCLAT was pleased to dismiss the recall applications filed by Mantri and Baaskaran S. and found that the conditions for recall of its order dated October 14, 2024, were not made out in the present case.

Furthermore, the Hon’ble NCLAT reaffirmed a shareholders’ lack of locus standi to challenge the admission of a corporate debtor to CIRP considering its status as a mere investor and opined that the same cannot be overcome / bypassed by seeking substitution in place of a suspended director considering the statutorily distinct roles.

ACRE was represented by Mr. P. S. Raman, Senior Advocate and Advocate General of Tamil Nadu. The remaining members of the committee of creditors were represented by Mr. Varghese Thomas.

Our Disputes Team comprised Lead Partner, Varghese Thomas, Partners, Aditi Deshpande and Srinivasan M.D., and Associates, Kabir Saund and Dharaniya Sri K.M

Tags CIRP, Corporate Insolvency, Dispute Resolution, IBC2016, Insolvency Law, JSA, Leading Law Firm, Leading Lawyers, Legal Updates, Nclat

JSA Brief | February 2025

This edition of the JSA Brief showcases JSA authored articles, updates & newsletters and achievements such as deals and events in all practice area over the preceding month (February 2025).

To read further details, click here or refer to the below document.

For more details, please contact [email protected]

*In case the document is not visible on the device you are using, please click the link above.

Tags Articles, Deal Making, Events, JSA, JSA Prism, Legal Updates, Newsletters, Publications, Recognitions

JSA Prism | Capital Markets | March 2025

Please click here to download the Prism as a PDF.

Key updates for equity capital markets under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025

On March 3, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) approved amendments to the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (“SEBI ICDR Regulations”). These amendments were published in the official gazette on March 8, 2025, as the SEBI ICDR Amendment Regulations, 2025 (“Amendment”). The Amendment will take effect from the specified date except for regulations related to the rights issue by a listed issuer which will come into force on the 31st day of their publication in the official gazette and apply to rights issues approved by the board of the issuer post this Amendment. The Amendment introduces certain significant structural changes affecting capital raising, disclosure norms, compliance obligations, and regulatory oversight.

The Amendment also takes care of some of the recurring SEBI observations on the draft offer documents filed by companies eyeing for an Initial public offering (“IPO”). It standardises some of the definitions and provisions under the SEBI ICDR Regulations and SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosures Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”) and resonates with the views taken by expert committees through their consultation papers in relation certain conceptual ambiguity existing under various capital markets regulations in the past.

Some of the key amendments in the equity capital markets space are discussed below:

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)

Regulation 5(2) of the SEBI ICDR Regulations has been amended to introduce SARs, as valid dilutive instruments, which are fully exercised prior to filing of the Red Herring Prospectus (“RHP”), in addition to Employee Stock Option Plans (“ESOPs”) and compulsorily convertible securities which will convert prior to filing of the RHP for entities eligible to make an IPO. As per the Amendment, relevant disclosure pertaining to SARs should be accordingly made in the draft offer document and offer documents. This Amendment is in line with the evolving corporate incentive structures.
The Amendment also harmonises the existing provisions under the SEBI (Share-Based Employee Benefits and Sweat Equity) Regulations, 2021 which allows and regulates such stock-based benefits and SEBI Listing Regulations. It also speaks with the consultation paper released by the expert committee for facilitating ease of doing business and harmonisation of the provisions of SEBI ICDR Regulations and SEBI Listing Regulations dated June 26, 2024.

Finalised position in relation to employee benefits schemes in relation to IPO:

ESOPs settled for equity shares – Permitted;
ESOPs settled for cash (fully or partly) – Not permitted. Only cashless exercise is permitted in terms of SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014;
SARs settled for equity shares – Permitted now, subject to full exercise of rights prior to RHP filing. Further, SEBI advisory dated February 27, 2023, will stand modified and be read in conjunction with aforementioned amendment;
SARs settled for cash – Not permitted; and
any other employee benefit scheme settled for cash – Not permitted.

Accordingly, SARs are to be considered for lock-in calculation of Minimum Promoters’ Contribution (“MPC”) and the exemption from lock-in requirements available in respect of ESOPs will also be extended to any equity shares allotted pursuant to a bonus issue against equity shares allotted pursuant to SARs scheme.

Changes in public announcement norms

Public announcements post filing of the IPO draft offer document within 2 (two) days have been amended to 2 (two) working days. Further, the requirement to keep the draft offer document available for public comments for 21 (twenty-one) days from the date of its filing has been amended to 21 (twenty-one) days from the date of publication of the public announcement on filing of the draft offer document.
The pre-issue advertisement and the price band advertisement have been merged into 1 (one) advertisement, which will be made at least 2 (two) working days prior to the opening of the issue. The format of the pre-issue and price band advertisement has also been provided in the Amendment.

Promoter lock-in

Under the pre-Amendment regime, if the majority of the fresh issue proceeds are proposed to be utilised for capital expenditure, the MPC lock-in period will be 3 (three) years from the date of allotment in the initial public offer, otherwise, the MPC will be locked in for 18 (eighteen) months. Similarly, promoters holding in excess of MPC will be locked in for a 6 (six) month period. However, if the majority of the fresh issue proceeds is proposed to be utilised for capital expenditure, the lock in will be for 1 (one) year.

The Amendment also formalises the repayment of existing loans that may have been taken for the purpose of such capital expenditure to be considered for the fresh issue proceeds being utilised for capital expenditure. This has been a recurring SEBI observation and has now been introduced as an amendment for SEBI ICDR Regulations.

Faster approvals, revised compliance timelines and changes in renunciation provisions for rights issue

Reduced timelines and faster approval process for rights issue by a listed issuer has been introduced. The rights issue amendments are in line with the consultation paper released for faster rights issue with flexibility of allotment to selective investors on August 20, 2024. Post the Amendment, the draft letter of offer is not required to be filed with SEBI; instead, it can be directly filed with stock exchanges.
Public announcement of draft letter of offer on issuer’s website for public comments has been omitted.
The threshold for applicability of the SEBI ICDR Regulation for rights issue by a listed issuer wherein the aggregate value of the issue is INR 50,00,00,000 (Indian Rupees fifty crore) or more under Regulation 3 and Regulation 60 of the SEBI ICDR Regulation has now been omitted.
Therefore, the SEBI ICDR Regulations is now uniformly applicable for all rights issue regardless of the issue size.
Regulation 69 of the SEBI ICDR Regulation has been amended to eliminate the obligation for issuers to appoint a merchant banker for rights issue. Instead, the responsibilities have been redistributed amongst the issuer, the registrar and the stock exchanges. Accordingly, the requirement of submission of due diligence certificate by the lead managers under Regulation 71 of the SEBI ICDR Regulation and provisions relating to due diligence being conducted by the merchant bankers and the mandatory issue agreement to be entered between the issuer and merchant bankers have also been deleted. However, given the stock exchange approval process, issuers may still require to appoint advisors for the purpose of ensuring compliance under SEBI ICDR Regulations.
An additional eligibility criterion has been added wherein in case the equity shares of the issuer are suspended from trading as a disciplinary measure as on the reference date, the issuer will not be eligible to make the rights issue. This will deter companies under trading suspensions from using rights issues as a means to resolve their liquidity issues.
The Amendment also allows the promoters/promoter group to renounce their rights entitlements in favour of specific investors. Regulation 77 B has been introduced vide this Amendment which defines the specific investor as any investor who is eligible to participate in rights issue and whose name has been disclosed by the issuer in terms of Regulation 84 in the issue related advertisements. Further, the issuers are also allowed to allocate any unsubscribed portions to specific investors basis the terms captured in the Amendment. As per the Amendment, the letter of offer should specifically disclose the intention of issuer to allot the under-subscribed portion of the rights issue to specific investors.

Post this Amendment, SEBI has also issued a circular no. SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD-1/P/CIR/2025/31 on March 11, 2025, wherein the revised timelines for completion of the rights issue process within 23 (twenty-three) working days from the date on which the board of the issuer approves the rights issue has been notified.

Objects related amendments

The Amendment clarifies that for loan repayment object, a certificate on utilisation of loan for the purpose it was availed may be obtained from the chartered accountant, holding a valid peer review certificate instead of the statutory auditor: (a) for the periods not audited by the current statutory auditor; or (b) the loan which is proposed to be repaid was availed by a subsidiary and the issuer’s current statutory auditor is not the statutory auditor of the subsidiary.

Disclosure pertaining to the object of utilisation of long-term working capital to be included basis audited standalone financials. Such standalone financial statements will be restated if there are any restatements/adjustments in the restated consolidated financial statements which may have impact on the audited standalone financial statements.

Disclosure of material agreements in the IPO offer document

The Amendment requires the disclosure of agreements impacting the management or control of the issuer or imposing any restriction or creating any liability upon the issuer (as prescribed under clause 5A, paragraph A of part A (Schedule III) of SEBI Listing Regulations) in the IPO offer document.

Litigation related disclosure in the IPO offer document

In line with the SEBI Listing Regulations, with respect to disclosures relating to outstanding civil litigation in the IPO offer documents, the Amendment mandates to follow the lower of the monetary thresholds prescribed therein. Under the pre-Amendment regime, the issuer was required to disclose material civil litigation in its IPO offer documents based on the materiality policy adopted by its board.

All criminal proceedings involving key managerial personnel and senior management of the issuer and also the actions by regulatory authorities and statutory authorities against such key managerial personnel and senior management of the issuer are required to be disclosed.

Disclosure of voluntary proforma financials

Basis the Amendment, the issuer may voluntarily disclose proforma financial statements of acquisitions/divestments even when such acquisitions/divestments are below the materiality threshold specified in the SEBI ICDR Regulations or if the acquisitions/divestments have been completed prior to the latest period for which financial information is disclosed in the IPO offer document. The issuer may also include financial statements of a business or subsidiary acquired/divested, provided such financial statements are certified by the auditor of the business or subsidiary acquired/divested, or chartered accountants holding a valid peer review certificate.

Amendments pertaining to confidential filings

Basis the Amendment, the issuer is required to make a public announcement of the confidential filing within 2 (two) working days of filing of the draft offer document and updated draft RHP – I. Further, SARs which are fully exercised for equity shares prior to the filing of the RHP are now exempted for confidential filings.
Other important amendments:
- compliance officer must be a qualified company secretary. This is in line with the existing obligations of a compliance officer under SEBI Listing Regulations;
- the Amendment also clarifies that the calculation of price per share for determining ineligible securities for MPC, to be done after adjusting the same for corporate actions such as share split, bonus issue, etc. undertaken by the issuer;
- in relation to Regulation 6(2) offerings, under the pre-Amendment regime, if the shares offered by a shareholder (individually or PAC) were more than 20% of the pre-issue shareholding of the issuer, the shareholder cannot offer more than 50% of their pre-issue shareholding. In a situation wherein the pre-issue shareholding is less than 20%, the shareholder cannot offer more than 10% of the pre-issue shareholding of the issuer. The Amendment provides the clarity that the shareholding to be calculated as on the date of the IPO draft offer document and the threshold limit will apply cumulatively to the total number of shares offered for sale to the public as well as any secondary sale transactions prior to the IPO; and
- additional disclosures in the IPO offer documents.
In offer document summary, the details pertaining to the pre-issue and post-issue shareholding as at allotment in the prescribed format must be included for the promoter(s), promoter group and additional top 10 (ten) shareholders of the issuer.
In relation to disclosure under basis for offer price chapter, in relation to disclosure of EPS, P/E ratio, RoNW and NAV, a new format has been introduced. A statement to be added that the lead managers have exercised due diligence and satisfied themselves before assigning weights with respect to EPS and RoNW.

This Prism has been prepared by:

Madhurima Mukherjee Saha Partner	Arka Mookerjee Partner	Anuj Pethia Partner

Pracheta Bhattacharya Partner	Siddhartha Desai Partner	Shivali Singh Partner

	Anshu Bansal Partner

For more details, please contact [email protected]

Tags Capital Markets, IPO, JSA, Leading Law Firm, Leading Lawyers, Legal Updates, SEBI, Securities

Chambers Global Practice Guides, Question & Answers for Private Credit 2025 India

Our Partners, Divyanshu Pandey, Utsav Johri, Tirthankar Datta, Sucheta Bhattacharya and associate Nishal Makharia, from the Banking and Finance Practice, have authored a comprehensive global practice guide titled “Private Credit 2025” published by Chambers and Partners.

This authoritative publication delves into the evolving landscape of private credit in India and provides invaluable insights for industry professionals. It addresses key trends and challenges facing the sector in the coming years while offering strategic recommendations for navigating this dynamic environment.

To access the full guide and enrich your knowledge on private wealth management, please click here.